Amal Saleh, E., Sajjadi, S., & Yarmohammadi, L. (2006). The representation of social actors in the EFL high school textbooks in Iran. MEXTESOL Journal, 30(1), 9-23.
Ansary, H., & Babaii, E. (2003). Subliminal sexism in current ESL/EFL textbooks. Asian EFL Journal, 5(1), 200-241.
Apple, M. W., & Christian-Smith, L. K. (1991). The politics of the textbook. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315021089
Babaii, E., & Sheikhi, M. (2018). Traces of neoliberalism in English teaching materials: A critical discourse analysis. Critical Discourse Studies, 15(3), 247-264. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2017.1398671
Bowen, P., & Delaney, D. (2014). Got it 1. Oxford University Press.
Catalano, T. (2012). The denaturalization of Romanies in Italy: How language and image work together. International Journal of the Image, 2(4), 23-30.
Cortez, N. A. (2008). Am I in the book? Imagined communities and language ideologies of English in a global textbook. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona, USA.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Critical discourse analysis in practice: Description. Longman.
Fairclough, N. (2001a). Language and power (2nd ed.). Longman.
Fairclough, N. (2001b). Critical discourse analysis as a method in social scientific research. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer. (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp.121-138). SAGE.
Fairclough, N. (2003).
Analyzing discourse. Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857 028020.d4
Fitzgibbon, A. (2014). Ideologies and power relations in a global commercial English language textbook used in South Korean universities: A critical image analysis and a critical discourse analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Queensland, Australia.
Gee, J. P. (2011). How to do discourse analysis: A toolkit (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). Introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). Arnold.
Hasan, R. (1986). The ontogenesis of ideology: An interpretation of mother and child talk. In T. Threadgold, A. Grosz, G. Kress, & M. Halliday (Eds.), Semiotics, ideology, and language (pp. 125-146). Sydney Association for Studies in Society and Culture.
Jafarigohar, M., & Ghaderi, E. (2013). Evaluation of two popular EFL course books. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 2(6), 25-34.
Janks, H., Dixon, K., Ferreira, A., Granville, S., & Newfield, D. (Eds.). (2013). Doing critical literacy: Texts and activities for students and teachers. Routledge.
Kachru, B. B. (1990). The alchemy of English: The spread, functions, and models of nonnative Englishes. University of Illinois Press.
Kress, G., & van Leeuawn, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Lee, I. (2011). Teaching how to discriminate: Globalization, prejudice, and textbooks. Teacher Education Quarterly, 38(1), 47-63.
Lewis, D. (2005). Reading contemporary picture books: Picturing text. Routledge.
Nye, J. (2004). Soft power: The means to success in world politics. Public Affairs.
Phillipson, R. (2011). English: From British English to corporate English. Sociolinguistic Studies, 5(3), 441-464. https://doi.org/10.1558/sols.v5i3.441
Razmjoo, S. A. (2007). Developing a textbook evaluation scheme for the expanding circle.
Iranian Journal of Applied Language Studies,
2(1), 121-136.
https://doi.org/10.22111/ IJALS.2012.64
Razmjoo, S. A., & Kazempourfard, E. (2012). On the representation of Bloom’s revised taxonomy in Interchange course books. The Journal of Teaching Language Skills (JTLS), 4(1), 18-29. https://doi.org/10.22099/jtls.2012.336
Riazi, A. M. (2003). What textbook evaluation schemes tell us? A study of the textbook evaluation schemes of three decades. In W. A. Renanda. (Ed.), Methodology and materials design in language teaching: Singapore (pp. 53-88). SEAMEO Regional Center. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2005.06.011
Richards, J. C. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667220
Sahragard, R., & Davatgarzadeh, G. (2010). The representation of social actors in Interchange Third Edition series: A critical discourse analysis. The Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 2(1), 67-89. https://doi.org/10.22099/jtls.2012.401
Sahragard, R., Rahimi, A., & Zaremoayyedi, I. (2009). An in-depth evaluation of interchange series. Porta Linguarum, 12(1), 37-54. https://doi.org/10.30827/Digibug.31870
Samadikhah, M., & Shahrokhi, M. (2015). A critical discourse analysis of ELT materials in gender representation: A comparison of Summit and Top Notch.
English Language Teaching, 8(1), 121-133. https://doi.org/
10.5539/elt.v8n1p121
Seargeant, P. (2008). Language, ideology, and English within a globalized context. World Englishes, 27(2), 217-232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.2008.00553.x
Simon-Maeda, A. (2004). A course on gender and language issues. In B. Norton & A. Pavlenko (Eds.), Gender and English language learners (pp. 127-142). TESOL International.
Tajeddin, Z., & Teimournezhad, S. (2015). Exploring the hidden agenda in the representation of culture in international and localized ELT textbooks. The Language Learning Journal, 43(2), 180-193. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2013.869942
Tavassoli, K., Souzandehfar, M., & Soozandehfar, S. M. A. (2019). Representational repertoires of neoliberal ideologies in Interchange series. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 22(2), 145-184.
van Dijk, T. (2001). Multidisciplinary CDA: A plea for diversity. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 37-64). SAGE. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9780857028020
Wodak, R. (2014). Critical discourse analysis. Routledge.
