Journal of new advances in English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics

Journal of new advances in English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics

The Role of Task Types with Different Task Complexity in EFL Learners’ Speaking Performance Complexity, Accuracy, and Fluency across Language Proficiency

Document Type : Original Article

Author
Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch
10.22034/Jeltal.2021.3.2.5
Abstract
The purpose of the current study was to find out the role of task types with different task complexity in complexity, accuracy, and fluency (CAF) of speaking performance in elementary, intermediate, and advanced EFL learners. In order to achieve the above-mentioned goal, 60 participants were randomly selected from 90 composing 21 elementary, 20 intermediate, and 19 advanced participants through Oxford Placement Test. The selected participants were asked to perform different task types (i.e. personal information exchange, narrative, and decision-making) and learners’ speaking CAF was measured and analyzed. These three tasks were chosen because they vary the importance of background knowledge and general familiarity. The sampled participants were asked to perform the prepared tasks in different task complexities (low, mid, and high) and their oral CAF was measured and analyzed. To measure CAF, percentage of error-free C-units for accuracy, clauses per C-units for grammatical complexity, type-token ratio (TTR) for lexical complexity, the number of tokens (words)/total task time (per minutes) for fluency were used. The results of mixed between-within subjects analysis of variance indicated that task types were significant factors on CAF. Furthermore, the results showed that proficiency level was statistically significant on CAF as well. The findings of this study provide pedagogical implications and recommendations for language teachers, material developers, and language assessors.
Keywords

Ahmadian, M. J., & Tavakoli, M. (2011). The effects of simultaneous use of careful online planning and task repetition on accuracy, complexity, and fluency in EFL learners’ oral production. Language Teaching Research, 15(1), 35-59.
Bachman, L. F. (2004). Statistical analyses for language assessment book: Cambridge University Press.
Benevento, C., & Storch, N. (2011). Investigating writing development in secondary school learners of French. Assessing Writing, 16(2), 97-110.
Bradlow, A. R., Kim, M., & Blasingame, M. (2017). Language-independent talker-specificity in first language and second-language speech production by bilingual talkers: L1 speaking rate predicts L2 speaking rate. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 141, 886–899.
Bosker, H. R., Pinget, A. F., Quené, H., Sanders, T., & de Jong, N. H. (2013). What makes speech sound fluent? The contributions of pauses speed and repairs. Language Testing, 30, 159–175.
Cohen, L. M., & Manion, L. (1998). L.(1989) Research Methods in Education. New York: Routledge.
Cook, V. (2013). Second language learning and language teaching. New York: Routledge.
Ellis, R., & Barkhuizen, G. P. (2005). Analysing learner language: Oxford University Press Oxford.
Frear, M. W., & Bitchener, J. (2015). The effects of cognitive task complexity on writing complexity. Journal of Second Language Writing, 30, 45-57.
Huensch, A., & Tracy–Ventura, N. (2016). Understanding second language fluency behaviour: The effects of individual differences in first language fluency, cross-linguistic differences, and proficiency over time. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38, 755– 785.
Huensch, A., & Tracy–Ventura, N. (2017). L2 utterance fluency development before, during, and after residence abroad: A multidimensional investigation. Modern Language Journal, 101, 275–293.
Hunter, A.–M. (2017). Fluency development in the ESL classroom: The impact of immediate task repetition and procedural repetition on learners’ oral fluency. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
Ishikawa, T. (2006). The effect of task complexity and language proficiency on task-based language performance. Journal of Asia TEFL, 3(4).
Jafari, S. (2006). The effects of planning condition, task structure, and gender on different aspects of Iranian intermediate EFL learners' performance (fluency, accuracy, complexity, and lexical density) in written tasks. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
Kim, Y., Nam, J., & Lee, S.-Y. (2016). Correlation of proficiency with complexity, accuracy, and fluency in spoken and written production: Evidence from L2 Korean. Journal of the National Council of Less Commonly Taught Languages, 19, 147-181.
Kormos, J., & Dénes, M. (2006). Exploring measures and perceptions of fluency in the speech of second language learners. System, 32, 145–164.
 Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2012). Syntactic complexity, lexical variation and accuracy as a function of task complexity and proficiency level in L2 writing and speaking. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA (pp. 143–170). Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Laufer, B. & Hulstijn, J. (2001). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: The construct of task-induced involvement. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 1-26.
Leaper, D. A., & Riazi, M. (2014). The influence of prompt on group oral tests. Language Testing, 31(2), 177-204.
Long, M. H., & Porter, P. A. (1985). Group work, inter-language talk, and second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 19(2), 207-228.
Mizera, G. J. (2006). Working memory and L2 oral fluency. University of Pittsburgh.
Najmi, K., Naserbakht, M. (2021). The effect of "Drops" application as gaming on vocabulary learning of Iranian EFL young learners. Journal of new advances in English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 3(1), 518-533.
Najmi, K., Siyyari, M., Abassian, G. (2020). The Relationship between Three Components of CAF in Learners’ Oral Performance at Different Proficiency Levels. Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice, 13(26), 254-284.
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2009). Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 555-578.
Pallant, J. (2013). SPSS survival manual: McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
Peltonen, P. (2018). Exploring connections between first and second language fluency: A mixed methods approach. Modern Language Journal, 102, 676– 692.
Rezazadeh, M., Tavakoli, M., & Eslami Rasekh, A. (2011). The role of task type in foreign language written production: focusing on fluency, complexity, and accuracy. International Education Studies, 4(2), 169-176.
Richards, J. C., & Renandya, W. A. (2002). Methodology in language teaching. Cambridge:
          Cambridge University Press.
Robinson, P. (2003). The cognitive hypothesis, task design, and adult task-based language learning. University of Hawai'I Second Langauge Studies Paper 21 (2).
Robinson, P. (2011). Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance (Vol. 2): John Benjamins Publishing.
Robinson, P., Cadierno, T., & Shirai, Y. (2009). Time and motion: Measuring the effects of the conceptual demands of tasks on second language speech production. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 533-554.
Samuda, V., & Bygate, M. (2008). Tasks in second language learning: Springer.
Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention'in P. Robinson (ed.): Cognition and Second Language Instruction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Segalowitz, N. (2010). Cognitive bases of second language fluency. New York: Routledge.
 Segalowitz, N., French, L., & Guay, J.–D. (2017). What features best characterize adult second language utterance fluency and what do they reveal about fluency gains in short-term immersion? Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 20, 90–116.
Seyyedi, K., Ismail, S., & Mohamed, A. (2014). The Effect of Task Structure on Second Language Learner’s Narrative Writing Performance. Journal of Foreign Languages, Cultures and Civilizations, 2(1), 41-53.
Shiriyan, Z., & Nejadansari, D. (2014). The effect of literature-response activities on the complexity, accuracy, and fluency of Iranian EFL learners’ L2 oral productions. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 1(2), 12-26.
Skehan, P. (1998a). A cognitive approach to language learning: Oxford University Press.
Skehan, P. (1998b). Task-based instruction. Annual review of applied linguistics, 18, 268-286.
Skehan, P. (2009a). Lexical performance by native and non-native speakers on language-learning tasks. In Vocabulary studies in first and second language acquisition (pp. 107-124): Springer.
Skehan, P. (2009b). Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis. Applied linguistics, 30(4), 510-532.
Skehan, P. (2014). Limited attentional capacity, second language performance, and task-based pedagogy. Processing perspectives on task performance, 211, 211-260.
Skehan, P. (2015). Limited attention capacity and cognition. Domains and Directions in the Development of TBLT, 8, 123-155.
Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1997). Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance. Language teaching research, 1(3), 185-211.
Tavakoli, P., & Foster, P. (2008). Task design and L2 performance. Language Learning, 58(2), 429-473.
Tavakoli, P., & Hunter, A.–M. (2018). Is fluency being “neglected” in the classroom? Teacher understanding of fluency and related classroom practices. Language Teaching Research, 22, 330–349.
Willis, J. (1996). A flexible framework for task-based learning. In J. Willis and D. Willis (Eds.), Challenge and change in language teaching (pp. 52-62). Oxford: Macmillan
Heinemann.Yuan, F., & Ellis, R. (2003). The effects of pre‐task planning and on‐line planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 monologic oral production. Applied linguistics, 24(1), 1-18.
Volume 3, Issue 2
September 2021
Pages 629-651

  • Receive Date 20 May 2021
  • Revise Date 25 August 2021
  • Accept Date 13 October 2021