Journal of new advances in English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics

Journal of new advances in English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics

A diachronic cross-disciplinary study of Readability in Literature Review Section in Research Articles

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Department of English, Bushehr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bushehr, Iran
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to investigate the comprehensibility of the text of the literature review section in research articles over the last 30 years. In other words, this study aims to investigate the trend of the change of LR text readability from 1988 to 2018. In this study, readability is defined as the level of difficulty of understanding a text based on the style of writing. This study follows previous studies to use the Flesch Reading Ease for measuring readability of the literature review section of research articles from 1988 to 2018. The literature review section of each selected research article was copied to a word file and their readability index of each was determined using the Flesch Reading Ease of the three distinct periods over the last 30 years. Results indicated an increase in the difficulty level of the text of the LR section over the last 30 years. Results also revealed a significant difference in the difficulty of the three distinct areas of research articles. Readability is generally considered one of the most important characteristics of effective writing. Yet little is known about the readability of the literature review section of academic articles in different journals. It is suggested that more research be conducted on the topic to shed more light on the stated gap.
Keywords

Abrahamson, E. and Amir, E. (1996), “The information content of the president’s letter to ahareholders", Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 23 (8), 1157-83.
Adelberg, A.H. and Razek, J.R. (1984), “The cloze procedure: a methodology for determining the understandability of accounting textbooks”, Accounting Review, 59 (1), 109-22.
Armstrong, J.S. (1980), “Unintelligible management research and academic prestige”, Interfaces, 10 (2), 80-6.
Bauerly, R.J., Johnson, J.D. and Singh, M. (2005), “Readability and the impact of marketing in marketing renaissance: opportunities and imperatives for improving marketing thought”, Journal of Marketing, 69, 19-20.
Bauerly, R.J., Johnson, D.T. and Singh, M. (2006), “Readability and writing well”, Marketing Management Journal, 16 (1), 216-27.
Chall, J.S. (1958), Readability: An Appraisal of Research and Application, Ohio State University Press, Columbus, OH
Chebat, J-C., Gelinas-Chebat, C., Hombourger, S. and Woodside, A.G. (2003), “Testing consumers’ motivation and linguistic ability as moderators of advertising readability”, Psychology and Marketing, 20 (7), 599-624.
Courtis, J.K. (1986), “An investigation into annual report readability and corporate risk-return relationships”, Accounting and Business Research, 16 (4), 285-94.
Crosier, K. (2004), “How effectively do marketing journals transfer useful learning from scholars to practitioners?”, Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 22 (5), 540-56.
DuBay, W.H. (2004), The Principles of Readability, Impact Information, Costa Mesa, CA.
Fisher, S.A. and Hu, M.Y. (1989), “Does the CEO’s letter to the shareholders have predictive value?" Business Forum, 14 (1), 22-4.
Flesch, R. (1949), The Art of Readable Writing, Harper, New York, NY.
Flory, S.M., Phillips, T.J. Jr and Tassin, M.F. (1992), “Measuring readability: a comparison of accounting textbooks”, Journal of Accounting Education, Vol. 10, pp. 151-61.
Gutner, T. (1998), “At last, the readable prospectus”, Business Week Online, 13 April, available at: http://businessweek.com11998/15/b3573135
Harrison, C. (1980), Readability in the Classroom, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Hartley, J., Trueman, M. and Meadows, A.J. (1988), “Readability and prestige in scientific journals”, Journal of Information Science Principles and Practice, 14 (2), 69-75.
Jones, K., Anderson, D.A. and Ruff, N. (1993), “Analysis of readability and interest of marketing education textbooks: implications for special needs learners”, Marketing Educators’ Journal, 19, 3-15.
Jones, M.J. (1997), “Methodological themes: critical appraisal of the cloze procedure’s use in the accounting domain”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 1, 105-28.
Kintsch, W. and Miller, J.R. (1984), “Readability: a view from cognitive psychology”, in Flood, J.(Ed.), Understanding Reading Comprehension, International Reading Association, Newark, DE, pp. 220-32.
Klare, G.R. (1963), The Measurement of Readability, Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA.
Klare, G.R. (1984), “Readability”, in Pearson, P.D. (Ed.), Handbook of Reading Research, Longman Press, New York, NY.
Klare, G.R. (1985), How to Write Readable English, Hutchinson, London.
Leong, E.K., Ewing, M. and Pitt, L. (2002), “E-comprehension evaluating B2B websites using readability formulae”, Industrial Marketing Management, 31 (2), 125-31.
Loveland, J., Whatley, A., Ray, B. and Reidy, R. (1973), “An analysis of the readability of selected management journals”, Academy of Management Journal, 16, 522-4.
McConnell, C.R. (1982), “Readability formulas as applied to college economics textbooks”, Journal           of Reading, 26 (1), 14-17.
McDonald, M. (2003), “Is marketing in safe hands?”, Marketing Leader, 21, 14-16.
Mader, T.J. and Playe, S.J. (1997), “Emergency medicine research consent form readability assessment”, Annals of Emergency Medicine, 29 (4), 534-9.
Metoyer-Duran, C. (1993), “The readability of published, accepted, and rejected papers appearing in college and research libraries”, College and Research Libraries, 54, 517-26.
Moore, E.M. and Shuptrine, F.K. (1993), “Warranties: continued readability problems after the 1975 Magnuson-Moss warranty act”, Journal of Consumer Affairs, 27 (1), 23-36.
Mouli, C.R. and Ramakrishna, C.P. (1991), “Readability of distance education course material”, Research in Distance Education, 3 (4), 11-13.
Murray, M.C. (1998), “Impact of plain English rule is under study”, National Underwriter, 10, 7-20.
Razek, J.R. and Cone, R.E. (1981), “Readability of business communication textbooks: an empirical study”, Journal of Business Communication, 18 (2), 33-41.
Razek, J.R., Hosch, G.A. and Pearl, D. (1982), “Readability of accounting textbooks”, Journal of Business Education, 58, 23-36.
Redish, J.C. and Selzer, J. (1985), “The place of readability formulas in technical communication”, Technical Communication, 32, 46-52.
Scott, C. and Suchan, J. (1987), “Public sector collective bargaining agreements: how readable are they?”, Public Personnel Management, 16 (1), 15-22.
Shuptrine, F.K. and Lichtenstein, D.R. (1985), “Measuring readability levels of undergraduate marketing textbooks”, Journal of Marketing Education, 7, 38-45.
Spinks, N. and Wells, B. (1993), “Readability: a textbook selection criterion”, Journal of Education for Business, 69 (2), 83-8.
Spiro, R.L., Kossack, S. and Kossack, E. (1981), “The introductory marketing text: an examination of readability”, Journal of Marketing Education, 3 (1), 41-51.
Stevens, T., Stevens, K.C. and Stevens, W.P. (1992), “Measuring the readability of business writing: the cloze procedure versus readability formulas”, Journal of Business Communication, 29 (4), 367-82.
Subramanian, R., Insley, R.G. and Blackwell, R.D. (1993), “Performance and readability: a comparison of annual reports of profitable and unprofitable corporations”, Journal of Business Communication, 30 (1), 49-61.
Wiley, T., Holliday, L. and Mendez, J.M. (1998), “The readability of undergraduate corporate finance texts”, Journal of Financial Education, 24, 31-44.
Volume 1, Issue 2 - Serial Number 2
September 2019
Pages 202-214

  • Receive Date 04 October 2019
  • Accept Date 12 November 2019