Journal of new advances in English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics

Journal of new advances in English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics

A Study of Authorial Identity Presence in Academic Articles: the Case of Iranian Scholars

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Department of English, Bushehr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bushehr, Iran
Abstract
This article reports an analysis of the authorial identity presence in the academic papers written by Iranian EFL speakers of Farsi. To this end, a corpus of papers was gathered from different journals and websites. Out of the gathered papers, the ones which were appropriate for the purpose of the study were selected as the sample, i.e. 20 papers written by Iranian EFL speakers of Farsi. To this end, Hyland’s (2004) identity categorization was chosen as the model of analysis which considers five types of stance for representing identity, namely, hedges, boosters, attitude markers, engagement markers, and self-mention markers. The content of the corpus was analyzed for instances of authorial markers Iranian writers utilized to manifest themselves in their works. It is worth mentioning that the Iranians’ tendency was toward using attitude markers as a representation of authorial identity in their academic papers while engagement markers were the most salient authorial identity markers.
Keywords

Bartholomae, D., & Petrosky, A. R. (1986). Facts, Artifacts and Counterfacts: Theory and Method for a Reading and Writing Course. Boynton/Cook Publishers, Inc.:Upper Montclair Plaza, Upper Montclair.
Burke, S. B. (2010). The construction of writer identity in the academic writing of Korean ESL students: a qualitative study of six Korean students in the US. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, US.
Cadman, K. (1997). Thesis writing for international students: a question of identity. English for Specific Purposes, 16(1), 3-14.
Ferris, D., & Hedgcock, J. (1998). Teaching ESL Composition: Purpose, Process, and Practice. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. English for Specific Purposes, 16(1), 3-14.
Hyland, K. (2002). Authority and invisibility: Authorial identity in academic writing. Journal of pragmatics, 34(8), 1091-1112.
Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. University of Michigan Press:USA.
Hyland, K. (2007). Genre pedagogy: Language, literacy and L2 writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(3), 148–164.
Hyland, K. (2011). Projecting an academic identity in some reflective genres.Ibérica: Revista de, 14(2), 52-70.
Ivanič, R. (1998). Writing and identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. John Benjamins: Philadelphia.
Ivanič, R. (1998). Writing and identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing (Vol. 5). John Benjamins: Philadelphia.
Irvin, L. L. (2010). What Is “Academic” Writing?. Writing Spaces: Readings on Writing, 1, 3-17.
Johns, A. (1997). Text, role and context. Cambridge: CUP
Munoz, M. C. (2013). The “I” in interaction: authorial presense in academic writing. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas, 8(1), 49-58.
Razmjoo, A. (2012). Language and Identity in the Iranian Context: The Impact of Identity Aspects on EFL Learners' Achievement. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 2(2), 99-121.
Rezvani, R., & Mansouri, T. (2013). Stripped of Authorship or Projected Identity? Iranian Scholars’ Presence in Research Articles. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 5(1), 91-110.
Steinke, S. (2012). Academic writing skills. Retrieved on January 21st, 2015 from http://docslide.us/documents/academic-writing-skills-sara-steinke-get-ahead-postgaduate-summer-programme-2012.html
Tang, R. and John, S. (1999). The ‘I’ in identity: Exploring writer identity in student academic writing through first person pronoun. English for Specific Purposes, 18(S1), 23-39.
 

  • Receive Date 02 February 2019
  • Revise Date 05 March 2019
  • Accept Date 05 March 2019