Journal of new advances in English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics

Journal of new advances in English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics

Comparing the Impact of Conceptual and Strategic Scaffolding on Paragraph Writing Proficiency among Iranian EFL Learners

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Department of English Language, Ha.C., Islamic Azad University, Hamedan, Iran
2 MA in Applied Linguistics, Department of English Language and Linguistics, University of Kurdistan, Iran
10.22034/jeltal.2025.7.1.10
Abstract
This study examined the comparative effects of conceptual and strategic scaffolding on paragraph writing proficiency among Iranian EFL learners. A total of 40 intermediate-level female learners from a language institute in Hamedan, Iran were selected via the Oxford Placement Test (OPT) and randomly assigned to two groups: one received conceptual scaffolding, and the other strategic scaffolding for paragraph writing. Over eight sessions, the conceptual scaffolding group focused on foundational writing principles such as topic sentences, coherence, and unity, while the strategic scaffolding group learned techniques like brainstorming, outlining, and revising. A pretest and posttest, scored using Jacob’s (1981) rubric, assessed learners' writing proficiency. Both groups showed significant improvement, as indicated by the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test. However, the Mann-Whitney U test revealed that the strategic scaffolding group outperformed the conceptual scaffolding group in terms of writing gains. These findings suggest that while both scaffolding methods are effective, strategic scaffolding may lead to greater improvements in writing proficiency. The study has important implications for EFL instructors, learners, and curriculum developers.
Keywords

Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Brown, A. L., Bransford, J. D., Ferrara, R. A., & Campione, J. C. (1989). Learning, remembering, and understanding. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (pp. 77-165). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Brown, H. D., & Lee, H. (2025). Principles of language learning and teaching: A course in second language acquisition. Taylor & Francis.
De La Paz, S., & Graham, S. (2002). Explicitly teaching strategies, skills, and knowledge: Writing instruction in middle school classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(4), 687-698.
Englert, C. S., Raphael, T. E., Anderson, L. M., Anthony, H. M., & Stevens, D. D. (1991). Making strategies and self-talk visible: Writing instruction in regular and special education classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 28(2), 337-372.
Estavillo, S. E. (2024). Listening and Speaking Pedagogical Approaches towards the Development of Innovative Macro Skills among English Teachers in Binakayan National High School: A Narrative Study. Educalingua2(1), 53-67.
Ghanbari, N., & Salari, M. (2022). Problematizing argumentative writing in an Iranian EFL undergraduate context. Frontiers in Psychology13, 862400.
Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 445-476.
Harris, K. R., Graham, S., Mason, L. H., & Friedlander, B. (2002). Powerful writing strategies for all students. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
Hogan, K., & Pressley, M. (1997). Scaffolding student learning: Instructional approaches and issues. Cambridge: Brookline Books.
Kuhn, D. (2007). Education for thinking. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Langer, J. A., & Applebee, A. N. (1986). Reading and writing instruction: Toward a theory of teaching and learning. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Newell, G. E. (1998). The effects of written between-draft responses on student writing and thinking about a text. Written Communication, 15(2), 250-305.
Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Pressley, M., Symons, S., Snyder, B. L., & Cariglia-Bull, T. (1992). Cognitive strategy instruction that really improves children’s academic performance. Cambridge: Brookline Books.
Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1994). Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257-285.
Tharp, R. G., & Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning, and schooling in social context. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Williams, J. D. (2022). Language acquisition and academic writing: Theory and practice of effective writing instruction. Routledge.
Volume 7, Issue 1
March 2025
Pages 257-273

  • Receive Date 22 December 2024
  • Revise Date 22 February 2025
  • Accept Date 28 February 2025