Journal of new advances in English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics

Journal of new advances in English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics

Supervisory Relationships, Constructing Academic Identity, and Transition to the Researcher: An Interpretative Single-Case Study

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Fahime Hajiabadi 1
Farzad Rostami 2
1 ; Department of English Language, Hakim Toos Higher Education Institute, Mashhad, Iran
2 English department, Islamic Azad University, Baneh Branch
10.22034/jeltal.2023.5.2.6
Abstract
The present interpretative case study aimed to explore constructing researcher identity through successful dyadic supervisory relationships. The only participant in the current single case study was Ako, a recently graduated doctoral student who published some papers with his supervisor and kept that intimate and fruitful relationship after graduation. The data were collected through in-depth interviews, journals, and narration. Thematic analyses (Braun & Clarke, 2006) were conducted to analyze the collected data. In line with Wisker’s (2012) framework, the findings generated four themes, including supervisor's qualities, supervisor’s affective expectations, supervisee’s journey, and relationship enhancement. The results revealed that a full-fledged and intimate supervisory relationship, in both formal and informal settings, contributed to developing researcher identity. This research enhances our understanding of the importance of a good supervisory relationship, both from a theoretical and practical perspective. It expands our knowledge of the qualities that should be present in a supervisor-supervisee relationship and the necessary exercises needed to foster an academic identity through such a relationship. The results have some implications for teacher educators, university managers, supervisors, and doctoral students. Given the absence of supervisor training courses in the Iranian context, this study highlights the need for universities to establish a platform for training supervisors. This platform would enable supervisors to become acquainted with various supervising models and reflect on their experiences. Moreover, it would create an environment for doctoral students to critically examine their perspectives and enhance their understanding of the potential outcomes that can arise during the supervision process.
Keywords
Keywords: Academic identity
Interpersonal relationship
Single-case study
Supervisee
Supervisor
References
 Andriopoulou, P. & Prowse, A. (2020): ‘Towards an effective supervisory relationship    in research degree supervision: insights from attachment theory’, Teaching in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1731449
Anne Benmore (2014): Boundary management in doctoral supervision: how supervisors negotiate roles and role transitions throughout the supervisory journey, Studies in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.967203
Armstrong, D., Gosling, A., Weinman, J., & Marteau, T. (1997). The place of inter-rater reliability in qualitative research: An empirical study. Sociology, 31, 597–606.
              https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038597031003015
Baptista, A. V. (2015). Mature Students’ Voices on the Ideal and the Reality of Doctoral Supervisors’ Role and Practice. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 1544–1551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.425
Bill Green (2005) Unfinished business: subjectivity and supervision, Higher Education Research & Development, 24:2, 151-163. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360500062953
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative zrch in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Casanave, C. P. (2018). Performing expertise in doctoral dissertations: Thoughts on a fundamental dilemma facing doctoral students and their supervisors. Journal of Second Language Writing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2018.02.005
Castleberry, A., & Nolen, A. (2018). Thematic analysis of qualitative research data: Is it as easy as it sounds? Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 10(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2018.03.019
Chen, D., Wang, Y., & Lee, W. (2016). Challenges confronting beginning researchers in conducting literature reviews. Studies in Continuing Education, 38(1), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2015.1030335
Cotterall, S. (2015). The rich get richer: International doctoral candidates and scholarly identity. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52(4), 360–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2013.839124
Creswell, J. W. (2014). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. SAGE publications. Edwards, E., & Burns, A. (2016). Language Teacher–Researcher Identity Negotiation: An Ecological Perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 50(3), 735-745. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-02-2017-0009
Fiss, P.C. 2009. Case studies and the configurational analysis of organizational phenomena. In The SAGE handbook of case-based methods, ed. D.S. Byrne, and C.C. Ragin, 424–440. London/Thousand Oaks: SAGE. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316679252
Ismail, H. M., Majid, F. A., & Ismail, I. S. (2013). “It’s complicated” Relationship: Research Students’ Perspective on Doctoral Supervision. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 90, 165–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.078
Kamler, B. and Thomson, P. (2006). Helping doctoral students write: Pedagogies for supervision. Oxon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdigh.2019.00005
Kamler, B., & Thomson, P. (2014). Helping doctoral students write: Pedagogies for supervision (2nd ed.). London, UK: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdigh.2019.00005
Kay Devine & Karen H. Hunter (2016): PhD student emotional exhaustion: the role of supportive supervision and self-presentation behaviors, Innovations in Education and Teaching International. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2016.1174143
Kelsey Halbert (2015) Students’ perceptions of a ‘quality’ advisory relationship, Quality in Higher Education, 21:1, 26-37. https://doi.org.10.1080/13538322.2015.1049439
Kidman, J., Manathunga, C., & Cornforth, S. (2017). Intercultural PhD supervision: Exploring the hidden curriculum in a social science faculty doctoral program. Higher Education Research & Development, 36, 1208–1221. https://doi.org.10.1080/07294360.2017.1303457
Leask, B. (2009). Using formal and informal curricula to improve interactions between home and international students. Journal of Studies in International Education,13, 205–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315308329786
Lee, A. & Murray, R. (2013). Supervising writing: helping postgraduate students develop as researchers. Innovations in Education and Teaching Interna https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2013.866329
Leibowitz, B., Ndebele, C., & Winberg, C. (2014). ‘It’s an amazing learning curve to be part of the project’: Exploring academic identity in collaborative research. Studies in Higher Education, 39(7), 1256–1269. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.801424
McCallin, A., and S. Nayar. (2012). “Postgraduate Research Supervision: A Critical Review of Current Practice.” Teaching in Higher Education 17 (1): 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2011.590979
McClure, J. W. (2005). Preparing a laboratory-based thesis: Chinese international research students’ experiences of supervision. Teaching in Higher Education, 10, 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/1356251052000291530
Melinda Kirk & Kylie Lipscombe (2019): When a Postgraduate Student Becomes a Novice Researcher and a Supervisor Becomes a Mentor: A Journey of Research Identity Development, Studying Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2019.1587606
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossy-Bass Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919862424
Murray, J., & Male, T. (2005). Becoming a teacher educator: Evidence from the field. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2004.12.006
Murphy, S., McGlynn-Stewart, M., & Ghafour, F. (2014). Constructing our identities through a writing support group: Bridging from doctoral students to teacher educator researchers. Studying Teacher Education, 10(3), 239–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2014.949656
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic Analysis: Striving To meet truthworthiness. Oaks. CA: SAGE Publications.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
Petersen, E. B. 2007. “Negotiating Academicity: Postgraduate Research Supervision as Category Boundary Work.” Studies in Higher Education 32 (4): 475–87.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070701476167
Pinnegar, S., Hamilton, M.L., & Fitzgerald, L. (2010). Guidance in being and becoming self-study of practice researchers. In L. Erickson, J. Young, & S. Pinnegar (Eds.), Navigating the public and private: Negotiating the diverse landscapes of teacher education (Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Self-Study of Teacher Education Practices) (pp. 203–206). Provo, UT: Brigham Young University. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6880-6_10
Reedy, K., & Taylor-Dunlop, K. (2015). Mentor-mentee relationship in an educational leadership doctoral program at Lynn University. Journal for Leadership and Instruction, 14(1), 38–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2023.2168121
Ridder, HG.  (2017). The theory contribution of case study research designs. Bus Res 10, 281–305. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385
Sandelowski, M. (2008). Member check. In L. Given (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 501–502). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12048
Skyrme, G. (2010). Is this a stupid question? International undergraduate student seeking help from teachers during office hours. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9, 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.02.012
Stake, R.E. 2005. Qualitative case studies. In The SAGE handbook of qualitative research, 3rd ed, ed. N.K. Denzin, and Y.S. Lincoln, 443–466. London, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800411409884
Stranger-Johannessen, E., & Norton, B. (2017). The African Storybook and language teacher identity in digital times. Modern Language Journal, 101(S1), 45-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12374
Suzanne Janssen, Mark van Vuuren & Menno D. T. de Jong (2020): Sensemaking in supervisor doctoral student relationships: revealing schemas on the fulfillment of basic psychological needs, Studies in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1804850
Skyrme, G. (2010). Is this a stupid question? International undergraduate student seeking help from teachers during office hours. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9, 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.02.012
Spaulding, L. S., & Rockinson-Szapkiw. (2012). Hearing their voices: Factors doctoral candidates attribute to their persistence. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 7, 200-220.Author1 & Author 2 (2020).
Unsworth, K., N. Turner, H. Williams, and S. Piccin-Houle. (2010). “Giving Thanks: The Relational Context of Gratitude in Postgraduate Supervision.” Studies in Higher Education 35 (8): 871–888. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903348396
van Rensburg, Gisela & Mayers, Pat & Roets, Lizeth. (2016). SUPERVISION OF POST-GRADUATE STUDENTS IN HIGHER EDUCATION. Trends in Nursing. 3. 10.14804/3-1-55. https://doi.org/10.14804/3-1-55
Wisker, G. (2005). The Good Supervisor. Palgrave: Macmillan.
Wisker, G., Robinson, G., & Jones, J. (2011). The culturally inflected voice: Negotiation and recognition without dumbing down. In V. Kumar & A. Lee (Eds.), Connecting the local, regional and global in doctoral education (pp. 101–122). Kuala Lumpur: University Putra Malaysia Press. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1636220
Yin, R.K. (2014). Case study research. Design and methods, 5th ed. London, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
 
 
Journal of new advances in English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics
Volume 5, Issue 2 - Serial Number 2
September 2023
Pages 1361-1374

  • Receive Date 07 June 2023
  • Revise Date 25 October 2023
  • Accept Date 22 November 2023