Journal of new advances in English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics

Journal of new advances in English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics

Authorial identity behind first person pronouns in English research articles of native and non-native scholars

Document Type : Original Article

Author
College of Humanities and Law; China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing
Abstract
Few studies to date have investigated how native English scholars and non-native English scholars establish their authorial identity through first person pronouns. To this end, utilizing Işık-Taş’s discourse functions of first person pronouns (2018) as the analysis framework, it aims to examine how the authorial identity is represented by first person pronouns (I/me/my/we/us/our) in 40 English research articles of Applied Linguistics respectively written by native speaker scholars and non-native speaker scholars. Two sub-corpora were analyzed: native English speaker corpora and non-native English speaker corpora. The singular first person was found to be the preferred choice by both scholars. However, the analyses revealed differences in the distribution and discourse functions of first person pronouns. The first person occurred more frequently in native English speaker corpora than does non-native English speaker corpora. Based on Işık-Taş (2018) framework, low-risk functions (e.g., representing a community) and medium-risk functions (e.g., stating a goal) contrasted starkly between the two corpora. The variation in both corpora suggests that the use of first person pronouns in English research articles is not only associated with the cultural context but also by the author’s proficiency and competitiveness to publish paper internationally.
Keywords

Atkinson, D. (2004). Contrasting rhetorics/contrasting cultures: Why contrastive rhetoric needs a better conceptualization of culture. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 3(4), 277–289.
Çandarlı, D., Bayyurt, Y., & Martı, L. (2015). Authorial presence in L1 and L2 novice academic writing: Cross-linguistic and cross-cultural perspectives. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 20, 192-202.
Chang, P., & Schleppegrell, M. (2011). Taking an effective authorial stance in academic writing: Making the linguistic resources explicit for L2 writers in the
social sciences. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10(3), 140-151.
Chen, R. (2020). Single author self-reference: Identity construction and pragmatic competence. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 45, 1-14.
Dueňas, P. (2007). ‘I/we focus on…’: A cross-cultural analysis of self-mentions in business management research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6(2), 143-162.
Harwood, N. (2005). ‘I hoped to counteract the memory problem, but I made no impact whatsoever’: Discussing methods in computing science using ‘I’. English for
Speci
fic Purposes, 24(3), 243–267.
Harwood, N. (2006). (In)appropriate personal pronoun use in political science: A qualitative study and a proposed heuristic for future research. Written Communication, 23(4), 424-445.
Hyland, K. (2001). Humble servants of the discipline: Self-mention in research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 20, 207–226.
Hyland, K. (2002). Authority and invisibility: Authorial identity in academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(8), 1091-1112.
Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173-192.
Işık-Taş, E. (2018). Authorial identity in Turkish language and English language research articles in Sociology: The role of publication context in academic writers' discourse choices. English for Specific Purposes, 49, 26–38.
Ivanič, R. (1998). Writing and identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Kuo, C.-H. (1999). The use of personal pronouns: Role relationships in scientific journal articles. English for Specific Purposes, 18(2), 121-138.
Martínez, I. A. (2005). Native and non-native writer’s use of first person pronouns in the different sections of biology research articles in biology. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), 174–190.
Matsuda, P. K. (2015). Identity in written discourse. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 140–159.
Molino, A. (2010). Personal and impersonal authorial references: A contrastive study of English and Italian linguistics research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9, 86-101.
Norton, B. (1997). Language, identity, and the ownership of English. Tesol Quarterly, 31(3), 409-429.
Rahimivand, M., & Kuhi, D. (2014). An Exploration of Discoursal Construction of Identity in Academic Writing. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1492–1501.
Sheldon, E. (2009). From one I to another: Discursive construction of self-representation in English and Castilian Spanish research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 28(4), 251-265.
Starfield, S., & Ravelli, J. (2006). “The writing of this thesis was a process that I could not explore with the positivistic detachment of the classical sociologist”: Self and structure in New Humanities research theses. English for Specific Purposes, 5(3), 222–243.
Tang, R., & John, S. (1999). The ‘I’ in identity: exploring writer identity in student academic writing through the first person pronoun. English for Specific Purposes, 18(1), 23-39.
Yang, Y. (2013). Exploring linguistic and cultural variations in the use of hedges in English and Chinese scientific discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 50(1), 23-36.
Volume 3, Issue 1 - Serial Number 1
March 2021
Pages 462-477

  • Receive Date 21 January 2021
  • Revise Date 18 February 2021
  • Accept Date 22 February 2021