Journal of new advances in English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics

Journal of new advances in English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics

An awareness of formulaic clusters in conclusion moves of Applied Linguistics research articles

Document Type : Original Article

Author
Hadi Kashiha
Department of English, University Putra Malaysia
Abstract
Writing academic research article is one of the most important endeavors through which the writer can contribute his own knowledge and create a voice among the members of disciplinary community. Exploring the linguistic features which are used to identify the rhetorical structures of academic research articles is of value to have a clearer view of this widely practiced genre. The present research investigates the use of formulaic clusters as a type of linguistic feature in writing research article conclusions by non-native writers. A corpus of 200 research article conclusions written by Iranian L2 users in the field of applied linguistics was compiled and the most frequent four-word formulaic clusters were identified and categorized structurally in the corpus. Then, the identified bundles were classified based on the communicative purpose they serve in each move and step of the conclusions following Yang and Allison’s (2003) move organization of research article conclusions. Findings demonstrated that L2 writers relied heavily on the use of specific formulaic bundles to perform the communicative functions associated with the moves and steps. The largest number of clusters was used to show Move 1, Summarizing the study and the least bundles occurred in Move 2, Evaluating the study.
Keywords
Communicative function
formulaic language
formulaic clusters
move and step
RA conclusion
References
Adel, A., & Erman, B. (2012). Recurrent word combinations in academic writing by native and non-native speakers of English: A lexical bundles approach. English for Specific Purposes 31(2) 81–92.
Aktas, N., & Cortes, V. (2008). A comparative corpus-based study of shell nouns as cohesive devices in published and ESL student writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7, 3–14.
Bahtia, V. K. (1997). Introduction: genre analysis and world Englishes. World Englishes. Vol. 16(3), 313-319.
Biber, D., & Barbieri, F. (2007). Lexical bundles in university spoken and written registers. English for Specific Purposes, 26(3), 263–286.
Biber, D., Connor, U., & Upton, T. (2007). Discourse on the move: Using corpus analysis to describe discourse structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (1999). Lexical bundles in conversation and academic prose. In H. Hasselgard & S. Oksefjell (Eds.), Out of corpora (pp. 181–190). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Cortes, V. (2004). If you look at . . .: lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics, 25, 371–405.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.
Brett, P. (1994). A genre analysis of the result sections of sociology articles. English for Specific Purposes, 13, 47–59.
Chen, Y.-H., & Baker, P. (2010). Lexical bundles in L1 and L2 academic writing. Language Learning and Technology, 14(2), 30–49.
Cortes, V. (2004). Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinary writing: examples from history and biology. English for Specific Purposes, 23(4), 397–423.
Cortes, V. (2006). Teaching Lexical Bundles In The Disciplines: An Example From A Writing Intensive History Class. Linguistics and Education. 17(4), 391-406.
Cortes, V. (2013). The purpose of this study is to: Connecting lexical bundles and moves in research article introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12(1), 33-43.
Erman, B. (2009). Formulaic language from a learner perspective. Formulaic language, 323.
Henry, A., & Rosenberry, R. L. (2001). A narrow-angled corpus analysis of moves and strategies of the genre: ‘Letter of Application’. English for Specific Purposes, 20, 153–167.
Hewings, M. (2006). Introduction. In M. Hewings (Ed.). Academic writing in context: Implications and applications (pp. 79–92). London: Continuum.
Hyland, K. (1998). Persuasion and context: The pragmatics of metadiscourse. Journal of Pragmatics. Vol. 30, 437-455.
Hyland, K. (2008). As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes, 27, 4-21.
Kanoksilapatham, B. (2003). A Corpus-based investigation of scientific research articles: linking move analysis with multidimensional analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
Karabacak, E., & Qin, J. (2013). Comparison of lexical bundles used by Turkish, Chinese, and American university students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 622-628.
Sandoval, M. (2010). Stance-taking strategies in the written discourse of research papers conclusion sections. Paper presented at the First International TESOL Convention, Clark Freeport Zone, Philippines.
Schmid, H. (2000). English abstract nouns as conceptual shells: From corpus to cognition. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Strunkyt, G., Jurkūnait, E. (2008). Written academic discourse: Lexical bundles in humanities and natural sciences. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Vilnius University.
Swales, J. (1981). Aspects of article introductions. Birmingham, UK: The University of Aston, Language Studies Unit.
Swales, J. (1990). Genre Analysis. English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wray, A. (2000). Formulaic sequences in second language teaching: Principle and practice. Applied Linguistics, 21(4): 463- 489.
Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wray, A., & Perkins, M. R. (2000). The functions of formulaic language: an integrated model. Language & Communication, 20(1), 1-28.
Yang, R., & Allison, D. (2003). Research articles in applied linguistics: Moving from results to conclusions. English for Specific Purposes, 22, 365–385.

  • Receive Date 21 November 2018
  • Revise Date 16 January 2019
  • Accept Date 22 February 2019